A constituent writes to her MP, Chris Loder of West Dorset. It’s an email we could all send.

West Dorset constituent Joanna Simpson isn’t at all impressed by the government’s appetite for law-breaking. She wrote to her MP, Chris Loder, last week, to beg him not to vote for the Internal Market Bill. She received the standard cut and paste reply. We liked her response to that bit of inaccurate flummery and asked if we could reproduce her response, which you can read further down.

But first , we must set the scene. Here is her email from Tuesday 22 September:

I know this is likely to reach stony ground but I am once again asking you to listen to your conscience and common sense to see a world beyond Boris Johnson and Dominic Cummings. 

If you vote for the Internal Market Bill again, you will be responsible for a crime. No-one voted for criminals. Whatever you have been threatened/ bribed with by your political bosses, surely your personal integrity is worth more than this? Not to mention the international status of our country which under Johnson’s premiership, has lost all credibility as a trustworthy nation. United Kingdom is a laughing stock all over the world and, if this bill passes, they will not only laugh at us but also shun us.

This government has ensured that Covid has brought us to our knees and now you want to destroy our status as a world power.

I hope you can face yourself in the mirror in the morning.

Mr Loder wasn’t impressed by her plea, responding with a bit of Cummings’ boilerplate probably sent by Conservative MPs from all over the UK.

(I am afraid you are going to have to read it for context or you could switch briefly to the careful dismantling of his specious arguments and untruths here, in Jon Danzig’s piece, then switch back to Joanna’s on-the-money reply below.)

Thank you for getting in touch about the UK Internal Market Bill and I’m pleased to share with you my insights and views so far.

We find ourselves in this situation because HM Government (HMG) has reached an impasse with the European Union (EU) in negotiating a trade agreement. There are two reasons for this impasse:

1. The EU wants greater access to our fishing waters, including with colossal supertrawlers. That is not acceptable to the Prime Minister. This is especially important to the 24 fishing vessels in Lyme Regis and West Bay in preventing supertrawlers from coming to our shores.

2. The EU wants to control our state aid arrangements. In other words, how much the UK Government can financially support companies should they need it. The Prime Minister has equally said no to this condition.

If this impasse is not resolved, and a no-deal Brexit is possible, parliament must support the Government in ensuring the territorial integrity of the UK.

HM Government does not want a no-deal Brexit and that is why we passed the EU Withdrawal Bill into law earlier this year. This Act included specific internal customs arrangements with Northern Ireland in order to ensure frictionless trade on its land border, which took a form not dissimilar to the ‘backstop’ that so many were concerned about last year. This arrangement within the Withdrawal Act itself was a statement of goodwill to the EU, even though politicians from Northern Ireland had their reservations.

We are now in a situation where, in the event of a no-deal exit, with no trading agreement in place, the EU is threatening to activate an enforced customs border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, frustrating the territorial sovereignty and integrity of Northern Ireland.

Such refusal would mean that the EU could prevent the movement of essential food and supplies from Great Britain into Northern Ireland. In my mind this is a clear attempt to divide the United Kingdom and, as Member of the United Kingdom Parliament, I cannot stand by and let this become a reality.

It is not HM Government’s intention to break international law – contrary to common belief. This Bill itself does not break the law, but it does give powers to HM Government to go against a previous international treaty in a worst-case scenario where there is no alternative. This is to preserve the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, albeit with a current amendment that will need Parliament’s permission.

We either act to preserve the United Kingdom’s integrity or we stand by and run the risk that, without this Bill becoming UK law, the EU could make decisions on behalf of Northern Ireland without the need for Northern Ireland’s consent. It amounts to a foreign power frustrating a sovereign nation.

Therefore, in Parliament over the coming weeks we need to choose from one of two options: either voting for or against this Bill.

 1. If we vote AGAINST the UK Internal Market Bill:

In the event of a no-deal exit, the border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland is vulnerable to jurisdiction of the European Union.

It also means that the EU would have a say over what goods and produce we could or could not move within our own country, meaning Great Britain would require EU permission to send food and supplies to Northern Ireland – part of our own country. This would create tariff borders inside the UK and put us in a position where if, for example, Northern Ireland experienced shortages which are usually remedied by importing from other countries, we would be unable to send supplies over the Irish Sea without the EU’s say-so or considerable tariffs. Many believe this would be the beginning of an annexation that would allow the United Kingdom to be broken up.

The Good Friday Agreement, and the peace it has achieved, could be threatened. The Government has committed to protecting the terms set out in the Good Friday Agreement, specifically that all parties must agree to border and boundary changes.

  2. If we vote FOR this Bill and it is adopted:

Passing the Bill will put us in a stronger negotiating position to achieve an EU trading agreement.

Northern Ireland will remain within the territorial sovereignty of the United Kingdom whatever happens if we vote for this Bill.

Frictionless trade will continue between Great Britain and Northern Ireland regardless which will support our economy and our British producers.

We keep our promise to fishermen and protect them from the EU’s predatory supertrawlers. Our Government has firmly made a commitment to fishermen that they will not be sold out due to Brexit and the Government is standing by that commitment.

We allow the UK Government to invest in communities across all of the home nations, bolstering our economic recovery from coronavirus. The Bill will, from January 2021, provide the UK Government with new powers to spend taxpayers’ money previously administered by the EU.

Some believe, as it passed the second reading last Monday night (14th September), that the Bill has become law. It has not. A ‘second reading’, gives permission for the Bill to progress further through the parliamentary process, which it is now doing, and with much debate to come this week and next.

The Bill in itself does not break the law and we have made sure that the Government would need parliamentary authority to breach a treaty obligation. But this Bill gives powers to HM Government to act to preserve the unity and territorial integrity of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland which is currently at risk if, paradoxically, the EU force us to a no-deal exit.

In my opinion, we are not seeing the EU acting in good faith. It is attempting to corner us, and paradoxically it is starting to feel that the EU itself is wanting to force a no-deal exit just to break up the UK.

Now is the time that we must decide whether or not to preserve the Union of the United Kingdom albeit, potentially, with some consequences for our treaty with the EU. In my opinion, there is only one right answer. We must protect the Union first and foremost.

From what I have seen and heard so far, I am therefore planning to support the Government in the hope that, in the end, none of these precautionary measures will be called on.

Chris Loder MP

By LMComms – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=92401952

Here’s Joanna’s response:

The fact remains that your government signed the Withdrawal Agreement and used it as a stepping stone in the fraudulent election win in December 2019. I believe that the new Tory candidates (such as yourself) brought in to replace those who were expelled from the party for not agreeing with Johnson and Cummings, were “expected” to toe the Party line and blindly support the corruption that has followed.

I am in horrified disbelief that you are unable to acknowledge the harm that is being inflicted on this country by the incompetence, greed and self-interest of your colleagues.

For all your simpering sycophancy to the rhetoric supplied by your bosses, you surely must see that our country is failing. Billions spent on a Covid approach that isn’t working, a border mooted for Kent, so few trade deals that we risk severe medicine and food shortages in January, deteriorating relationships with the international community because no one trusts UK under Tory dictatorship, prominent party members (Including 5 former prime ministers) speaking out in disgust at what you try to excuse – no amount of whining about EU not acting in good faith can excuse the actions of your government in condemning this country to an uncertain and, frankly terrifying, future. It is you who chose to leave the EU club, led by people who hated the fact that it’s a powerful, protective club. But now you’ve left, you can’t blame the club for protecting its own interests against those who seek to undermine it. Johnson, Gove, Cummings et al knew about the border issues when the agreement was signed and yet they believed they could just ride roughshod over the rules. It is not the EU who are moving the goalposts, it is your government.

As for fishing and supertrawlers in British waters, that is down to the people who sold the UK fishing rights to the highest bidders. Look it up… Don’t tell me that any fisherman in Lyme Regis is going to gain anything from what you so blindly support. You are party to diminishing your country and destroying everything you say you hold dear. Our strength was being a leading member of the EU which gave us clout round the world – on our own, we have nothing but history and a mistaken belief that UK is exceptional. When there is no industry, no goodwill, no trust, how can this island survive as anything but a lonely outpost scratching for any scraps they can get? It’s a tragedy and a crime and you must bear some responsibility for allowing it to happen.

The essence of this message needs repeating to every Conservative MP who is considering backing this appalling bill. Let’s get writing.